First, let’s establish this right away:
Shared parenting isn’t right for families where one parent struggles with addiction, there is a history of violence or abuse, or severe mental illness.
As of Friday April 27, Kentucky became the first state in the country with a “legal presumption” for joint custody in divorce proceedings.
Other states including Arizona, Missouri and South Dakota also have very progressive and strong shared-custody laws, and 25 states are debating legislation that would do the same.
For the vast majority of separated and divorced families, shared parenting is what is best for children.
There are more than 60 peer-reviewed, published articles that prove this.
Shared Parenting is best for parents and kids
It turns out that shared parenting is best for parents, both mothers and fathers.
After all, when you have a real break from your kids, a true support system in parenting, where the logistical, emotional, financial circus of childrearing is shared, the adults are free to build careers and businesses, devote important time to health, relationships and self-care.
This is not my opinion. It is fact, as outlined in the studies summarized below. This research is heeded by family courts and legislatures around the country.
In 2017, bills that would mandate that custody and visitation arrangements start at 50-50 were introduced in state 25 legislatures.
In 2018, that number is 20 states.
These are bipartisan efforts, and based on indisputable facts: It is unethical and sexist to presume that one parent is a better parent than the other, and both parents are legally entitled to time with his or her children.
Morality aside: It is best for children when they have equal time with both parents.
What is shared parenting?
Shared parenting means that in the event of separation or divorce, the children spend approximately equal time with both parents.
Often called “joint physical custody,” or “50-50 custody,” courts generally consider at least 35 percent of the time spent with one or the other to be equitably shared time, for the sake of being reasonable and managing the logistics of everyday life.
Shared custody has been common for decades, and this means that both parents have joint legal decision making powers when it comes to medical care, education, religion and where the children will live.
What is new is the deviation from the traditional divorced family schedule: Children reside with the mother, every-other-weekend and one weeknight with the father, and the father pays child support.
As research has found this time split to be detrimental to the children’s well being, and common sense deems it unethical, there has been a culture and legal shift towards shared parenting.
In Kentucky and other states leading the way on this front, the presumption is that both parents are fit, and therefore granted equal access to their children. The onus is on one or the other parent to show cause to minimize time with the children, such as in cases of addiction, severe mental health or abuse. Similar laws are commonplace throughout the world, but not the United States.
Terry Brennan, co-founder of Leading Women for Shared Parenting, which is leading this cause, said that it is not a tough campaign to convince legislators to support shared parenting bills — but that state bar associations consistently lead opposition to these laws.
“Research finds that this is a bipartisan issue, with both Democrats and Republicans supporting it equally, as well as both men and women.”
– Terry Brennan
Ginger Gentile, activist and filmmaker of Erasing Family, which explores the epidemic issue of parental alienation, which is closely related to a lack of shared parenting, said that in her research of the leading experts on divorced families, she struggled to find any voices that opposed shared parenting.
5 Reasons shared parenting is best for kids
Wake Forrest professor and shared parenting expert Linda Nielsen crunched the data of 54 studies and found that absent situations in which children needed protection from an abusive or negligent parent even before their parents separated—children in shared-parenting families had better outcomes than children in sole physical custody families.
This includes high-conflict divorces in which the fighting continues long-term. The measures of well-being included:
- Academic achievement
- Emotional health (anxiety, depression, self-esteem, life satisfaction)
- Behavioral problems (delinquency, school misbehavior, bullying, drugs, alcohol, smoking)
- Physical health and stress-related illnesses
- Relationships with parents, stepparents, and grandparents.
Shared parenting in high-conflict relationships
From an article in Psychology, Public Policy and Law:
“The best research currently available suggests that the quality of the parent-child relationship is more closely linked than parental conflict or the quality of the co-parenting relationship to children’s outcomes, with the exception of the most extreme forms of conflict to which some children are exposed.”
Conflict, coparenting, and the quality of the children’s relationships with each parent are all connected to children’s well-being.
This is not an “either-or” issue that ignores the role that parental conflict or co-parenting play in children’s lives.
Still, the data strongly supports the idea that the quality of the parent-child relationship is the best predictor of future outcomes for the children.
In other words, the role of conflict has too often been exaggerated and should not be the determining factor in child custody decisions or in regard to JPC arrangements except in those situations where the children need protection from an abusive or negligent parent.
Children need time with both parents
There is no reason to postpone overnight visits of infants or toddlers.
In fact, 110 international experts agree with the conclusion reached by psychologist Richard Warshak in his recent research paper:
“There is no scientific evidence that justifies limiting or postponing overnighting until children of separated parents reach the age of four.”
Read this whitepaper by bestselling author (Divorce Poison) and professor Warshak: Stemming the Tide of Misinformation: International Consensus on Shared Parenting and Overnighting.
Traditional visitation schedules can weaken father-child relationships for life
Study by Wake Forrest professor Linda Nielsen, published in the American Journal of family Law:
“Most children want to spend more time living with their fathers. Most do not like the every other weekend”
Indeed, this is one of the most consistent, most robust findings in the research on children of divorce.
Most children say they wanted more time with their fathers and that the most long lasting, most negative impact of their parents’ divorce was the weakened or lost relationship with their fathers.
The majority who had lived with their mothers said that shared parenting would have been in their best interests.
Not surprisingly, when fathers try to rebuild their relationships during the children’s early adult years, the relationship is often too strained or too damaged to be reconstructed.
As one of the most highly respected researchers on children of divorce, Joan Kelly, states,
“[f]or four decades children have reported the loss of the father as the most negative aspect of divorce. Even when they continued to see each other, most relationships declined in closeness over time. This has been primarily a result of the traditional visiting patterns of every other weekend which has been slow to change even in the face of mounting research evidence and a reluctance to order overnights for your children.”
Related Wealthysinglemommy.com posts about shared parenting:
Great articles about shared parenting:
List of 20 published articles about benefits of shared parenting from Leading Women for Shared Parenting
Institute for Family Studies: 10 Surprising Findings on Shared Parenting After Divorce or Separation
TIME magazine: This Divorce Arrangement Stresses Children Out Most