scroll top

15 most expensive suburbs to live in 2025

We earn commissions for transactions made through links in this post. Here's more on how we make money.

We ranked large U.S. suburbs (roughly 90,000+ residents) by how much of the average local wage would be eaten by two unavoidable bills: typical annual rent plus the annual cost of living (excluding rent). The higher the share, the tougher it is for a typical household to make ends meet. Below are the 15 suburbs where that combined burden is heaviest in 2025, with nearby city, key price points, and the percentage of wages swallowed each year. Use it as a reality check before you accept an offer, sign a lease, or plan a move.

1. Sunrise, Florida (Fort Lauderdale/Miami)

Sunrise, Florida (Fort Lauderdale/Miami)
Image Credit: Yanjipy, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Sunrise tops the list: the typical resident would spend about 95.2% of annual wages on rent plus other living costs. With a typical rent around $3,450 a month and a combined annual bite over $57,000, there’s little room left for savings, debt payoff, or emergencies. Home values are also high for a suburb, pushing many households into renting longer than planned. If you’re moving for work, negotiate relocation assistance or remote flexibility, and target housing within walking distance of daily errands to cut car costs that this ranking doesn’t include.

2. Miramar, Florida (Miami)

Miramar, Florida
Image Credit: Shutterstock

Miramar’s budget squeeze is severe: rent plus living costs consume about 84.1% of the average wage. Typical monthly rent sits near $2,865, and the non-rent cost of living pushes total annual outlays above $50,000. For families weighing Miramar against other Miami-area suburbs, the math favors households with multiple earners or those willing to trade space for shorter commutes and lower transport spending.

3. Miami Gardens, Florida (Miami)

Miami Gardens, Florida
Image Credit: Shutterstock

Miami Gardens isn’t far behind: the combined burden reaches 81.8% of wages. With typical rent around $2,750 monthly and robust everyday costs, many residents will feel “one bill away” from tight months. Budgeting here often means sharing housing, hunting for employer health plans that curb out-of-pocket costs, and timing leases to shoulder season when rents soften.

4. Plantation, Florida (Fort Lauderdale/Miami)

Plantation, Florida
Image Credit: Shutterstock

Plantation’s appeal, central location, and amenities come with a price: rent plus living costs eat about 78.3% of the typical local wage. A $3,000 monthly rent is common, and grocery, transport, and insurance costs keep budgets taut. If you’re set on Broward County, consider multi-bedroom leases with roommates or employer commuter perks to offset the hit.

5. Santa Clara, California (San Jose)

Image Credit: Tomwsulcer, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

In Silicon Valley’s shadow, Santa Clara posts a 77.8% wage burden even with higher local pay. Typical rent hovers near $3,449, and non-rent expenses lift the combined total close to $60,000 a year. Households that thrive here usually stack incomes, tap employer meal/transport benefits, and keep cars modest despite the high home values around $1.7M.

6. Vancouver, Washington (Portland)

Vancouver Washington
Image Credit: Spicypepper999, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

Across the river from Portland, Vancouver still strains budgets: 77.6% of the average wage disappears into rent and living costs. Typical rent near $2,990 keeps pressure high, while many residents split time and expenses across two states. The lever here is housing size downsizing, one bedroom can flip the monthly math more than chasing small grocery savings.





7. Cambridge, Massachusetts (Boston)

Cambridge, Massachusetts
Image Credit: Shutterstock

Cambridge combines elite employment with elite prices: about 73.6% of wages are absorbed by rent and living costs. Even strong salaries get tested by premium rents and everyday spending near central Boston. If you’re coming for school or biotech, consider transit-first locations and academic-year leases; fewer car expenses and roommate splits make the difference between scraping by and saving.

8. Richardson, Texas (Dallas)

Image Credit: Michael Barera, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Richardson’s telecom corridor is booming, but affordability is tight: 73.3% of wages go to rent plus living costs. Typical rent around $2,500 and a combined annual bite near $45,000 leave little slack for families on a single income. Strategies that help: employer HSA matches, energy-efficient apartments, and using DART to trim car ownership costs.

9. Meridian, Idaho (Boise)

Image Credit: Dmharris26, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

The Boise metro’s popularity shows up in Meridian’s numbers: 72.7% of wages vanish into rent and living expenses. With typical rent near $2,300, newcomers from pricier coasts may still feel “cheaper,” but locals see budgets stretched thin. House hacking (renting a room) and keeping commutes short help offset rising utilities and food costs.

10. Alexandria, Virginia (Washington, D.C.)

Alexandria, Virginia
Image Credit: Shutterstock

Historic charm meets D.C. proximity and a 72.6% wage burden. While salaries are solid, rents and non-rent costs push total annual outlays just over $50,000 for a typical household. Metro-accessible neighborhoods can ditch one car and save thousands, often the cleanest path to making Alexandria’s numbers work without trading location.

11. Irving, Texas (Dallas)

Image Credit: Michael Barera, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wiki Commons

In Irving, rent plus living costs claim roughly 70.4% of the average wage. Typical rent around $2,350 keeps pressure on single-earner households even with Dallas-area paychecks. Look for newer, energy-efficient buildings and employer commuter benefits; shaving transport and utilities moves the needle more than a dozen small line items.

12. Daly City, California (San Francisco)

Image Credit: Mertbiol, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

Daly City offers quick access to San Francisco but not relief at the register: 69.0% of wages go to rent plus living costs. Typical rent is about $2,800, and the Bay Area’s non-rent expenses are among the nation’s highest. Transit-oriented apartments and roommate splits remain the go-to moves for residents who want city proximity without San Francisco rents.

13. El Monte, California (Los Angeles)

El Monte, California
Image Credit: Busition, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

East of L.A., El Monte still isn’t “cheap”: the combined burden reaches 68.1%. Typical rent around $3,000 collides with elevated everyday costs, leaving little slack for single-income families. Many residents lean on multigenerational living, car-light routines, and employer health benefits to keep budgets predictable.





14. Metairie, Louisiana (New Orleans)

Image Credit: Infrogmation, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

Metairie’s headline number, 66.9% of wages consumed by rent and living costs, shows how far Gulf Coast prices have climbed. Typical rent near $1,650 looks tame next to coastal California, but local wages are lower, narrowing the gap. Renters who lock in longer leases and split utilities smartly can create just enough room to save.

15. Berkeley, California (San Francisco)

Berkeley, California
Image Credit: Shutterstock

Berkeley closes the list at 66.7%. A typical rent near $2,650 combines with Bay Area costs to swallow two-thirds of average wages even before student loans or childcare. Roommates, bike-first commutes, and careful timing of leases around the academic calendar remain the playbook for maintaining financial breathing room without leaving the East Bay.

Methodology

methodology written on a folder
Image Credit: Shutterstock

Highland Cabinetry benchmarked large U.S. suburbs using three inputs for 2025: typical monthly rent (annualized), a cost-of-living index excluding rent (scaled to a U.S. benchmark and annualized), and the average local wage. The core metric is % of wage spent = (Annual Rent + Annual Cost of Living) ÷ (Annual Average Wage) × 100. Suburbs were ranked by this share (higher = more expensive). Figures were normalized for comparability and rounded to keep the list readable.